• 1 day South Africa Launches Oil Giant to Revive Energy Sector
  • 1 day Suriname Votes for President Who Will Oversee Newly-Found Oil Wealth
  • 1 day Iraq Says Direct U.S.-Kurdistan Oil Deals Violate Constitution
  • 1 day Trump Slams UK’s North Sea Energy Policy, Again
  • 1 day U.S. Courting Asian Investors for $44 Billion Alaska LNG Project
  • 1 day Phillips 66 to Lay Off Most Workers at Los Angeles Refinery
  • 1 day U.S. Demands Unilateral Tariff Cuts From EU
  • 1 day Pemex Announces 3000 Job Cuts in Restructuring Effort
  • 1 day Asian Buyers Increase Purchases of Murban Oil
  • 2 days U.S. Resists EU Push to Lower Russian Oil Price Cap
  • 2 days China’s Oil Demand to Peak Within 5 Years as India’s Continues to Climb
  • 2 days CREA: EU Energy Payments to Russia Outpaced Ukraine Aid in 2024
  • 2 days Nigeria Urges Firms to Boost Oil Output to OPEC Quota
  • 2 days CP2 Project Approval Will Make Venture Global the Top U.S. LNG Firm
  • 2 days TotalEnergies Launches Major Solar Project in Spain
  • 2 days India LNG Terminal Expansion Faces Delay
  • 2 days Africa's Largest Refinery Expands Petrochemical Exports
  • 2 days Iraq Seals Major Oil Deal with Chinese Company
  • 2 days OPEC+ Considers Another Big Oil Production Hike in July
  • 2 days Oil Price Volatility Impacts ONGC Earnings
  • 3 days 17 Injured, 1 Missing After Fire on Chevron Offshore Angola Platform
  • 3 days Indonesia Signs Swap Deals to Ensure Domestic Gas Supply
  • 3 days SSE Cuts Renewables Spending in Blow to UK’s Green Goals
  • 3 days Oil Giant Rosneft Buys Russia’s Biggest Rare Earths Deposit
  • 3 days Solar Power Set to Surpass Nuclear Generation This Summer
  • 3 days Turkey Announces Major Shale Oil Reserve Discovery
  • 3 days CATL Predicts Major Shift to Electric Trucks in China
  • 3 days Centrica Divests North Sea Gas Field Stake
  • 3 days Indonesian Pertamina Imports Sanctions-Compliant Russian Crude
  • 3 days Petrobras Plans To Start Drilling in the Amazon in Weeks
  • 3 days U.S. Extends Chevron’s License to Operate in Venezuela
  • 4 days US Oil Inventories Keep Growing as Prices Sag
  • 4 days Ukraine Pushes G7 to Cut Russia’s Oil Cap to $30 as Revenues Tank
  • 4 days OPEC Remains Optimistic About Oil Demand Despite Economic Risks
  • 4 days Kazakhstan Defies OPEC+ Once Again
  • 4 days Saudi Arabia Is Prepared for Multiple Oil Price Scenarios
  • 4 days Woodside Sees Global Natural Gas Demand Surging by 50% by 2030
  • 4 days China Customs Data Shows Dramatic Changes in Oil Suppliers
  • 4 days Saudi Crude Burn Set to Rise This Summer
  • 4 days Australia Tribunal Rules $2.3 Billion Santos Gas Project May Proceed
Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Oil Traders Shun Chinese Tankers as Trump Prepares Port Fees

  • Oil traders are avoiding Chinese-built tankers due to proposed U.S. port fees.
  • The proposed fees could add up to $1.5 million per port entry for Chinese vessels.
  • This shift is disrupting the tanker chartering market and potentially impacting global supply chains.
Tanker

Oil traders are avoiding hiring tankers built in China amid concerns that port fees could be coming for Chinese vessels at U.S. ports as part of a plan by President Donald Trump to revitalize the American shipbuilding industry.

Under the plan – not yet finalized – the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) proposes a per-port-entry fee of up to $1.5 million on Chinese-built vessels, and up to $1 million per-port-entry fee on any vessel (Chinese built or non-Chinese-built) for operators that have any Chinese-built vessels in their fleet or orderbook.

The proposal is up for consultation and discussion and has already drawn criticism from many companies and business sectors, including U.S. agriculture producers and the Agriculture Transportation Coalition.

Oil traders will also see an impact as chartering non-Chinese vessels – where and when available – could upend global supply chains at a time when trade wars begin.

Now, oil traders and charterers that are booking vessels to call, load, or discharge cargoes at U.S. ports are seeking vessels not built in China, market sources told Bloomberg.

When there are alternatives, the traders now prefer non-Chinese tankers, with South Korean ships being the preferred option. South Korea-built vessels are already being chartered at higher rates than the China-built ships, according to Bloomberg’s anonymous sources.

South Korea has more oil tankers as a proportion of the global tanker fleet, but China accounts for over 70% of the number of vessels under construction, per estimates from Clarksons Research.

The proposal of the port fees could backfire with threatening the survival of the U.S. cargo carriers, executives testified last month in hearings on the plan.

The World Shipping Council (WSC) CEO, Joe Kramek, said at the USTR hearing,

“These proposals will result in increased costs for U.S. exporters and consumers as well as supply chain inefficiencies, while failing to provide China with effective incentives to alter its acts, policies, and practices.’’

“Economic impacts would reverberate throughout the economy, adversely impacting businesses, consumers, and especially farmers who export price-sensitive commodities,” Kramek added.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com


Download The Free Oilprice App Today
Download Oilprice.com on Apple Download Oilprice.com on Android

Back to homepage



ADVERTISEMENT



Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on April 03 2025 said:
    According to Bloomberg, oil traders and charterers that are booking vessels to call, load, or discharge cargoes at U.S. ports are seeking vessels not built in China amid concerns that port fees could be coming for Chinese vessels at U.S. ports as part of a plan by President Donald Trump to revitalize the American shipbuilding industry.

    The plan under study proposes a per-port-entry fee of up to $1.5 million on Chinese-built vessels, and up to $1 million per-port-entry fee on any vessel (Chinese built or non-Chinese-built) for operators that have any Chinese-built vessels in their fleet or orderbook.

    This is another brainless plan by Trump which is doomed to fail miserably. Moreover, oil traders will have to use Chinese built-tankers and other vessels whether they like it or not for the following reasons:

    1- China has 1194 tankers of all sizes with total capacity of 1.1 million dwt. Being the world's largest importer of crude oil, it will use its own tankers along with many tankers from friendly countries and shadow fleets of oil tankers to bring its crude imports home.

    2- China's shipbuilding market share accounts for 50% of the global market. It also controls 95% of shipping container production and 86% of the world's supply of intermodal classics.

    3- Like trying to rebuild the United States' shrinking manufacturing sector, it will take years to rebuild its shipbuilding industry. The US doesn't have the luxury for that with being the world's largest importer importing in 2024 $4.0 trillion of goods.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert
  • George Doolittle on April 03 2025 said:
    Raging west palm loonies and their Floridian Faggot Friends take command! $50 k for used umbrella art is *NOT ENOUGH* if only you little people could be less made to be poor...but you're not are you! Long $kmi kinder morgan energy strong buy really is the epitome of a quixotic quest be all this why the USA had the GATT process.

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News