U.S. Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu sided with the coalition in a preliminary injunction that restricted the city’s ability to enforce laws that prohibit sitting, lying or lodging on public property.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu sided with the coalition in a preliminary injunction that restricted the city’s ability to enforce laws that prohibit sitting, lying or lodging on public property.
Chiu and Mayor London Breed joined Gov. Gavin Newsom in calling on the U.S. Supreme Court to examine previous cases that have similarly restricted enforcement against involuntarily homeless people. Chiu’s office argues in his new filing that the court’s decision in Johnson v. Grants Pass stemmed from a misreading of a previous case.
“The decision has made it needlessly more difficult for San Francisco to address its ongoing homelessness crisis and to provide services,” the filing reads.
The Bay Area Council, a business advocacy group, and Neighbors for a Better San Francisco, a nonprofit that advocates for public safety, also asked the Supreme Court to reexamine the Grants Pass decision.
The filings argued that federal rulings have exacerbated homelessness on the West Coast and created confusion for cities that are managing encampments. The Neighbors for a Better San Francisco filing was signed by dozens of prominent business leaders, companies and individuals.
The city’s data shows its outreach teams have seen people accepting shelter at higher rates this year, although the number of encampments is on the rise.
The Coalition on Homelessness has argued that the enforcement of anti-camping laws makes it more difficult for people to escape homelessness.
The court is scheduled to discuss the petitions on Oct. 27.
David Sjostedt can be reached at david@sfstandard.com