Ohio Issue 1 Election Results: Establish a Constitutional Right to Abortion
Ohio Issue 1 Election Results: Establish a Constitutional Right to Abortion
‹ See all Ohio state resultsThis citizen-sponsored measure would make Ohio the latest in a string of states to enshrine a right to abortion in its Constitution. A “yes” vote would amend the Constitution to give individuals the “right to make and carry out one’s own reproductive decisions,” including on abortion. Read more
Passes
Ohio has voted to make the right to an abortion protected by the State Constitution.
Race called by The Associated Press.
race called
| Answer | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
|
Yes
|
2,186,965 | 56.6% |
|
No
|
1,675,730 | 43.4 |
|
Total reported
|
3,862,695 |
Where votes have been reported and where votes remain
These maps show the leading vote-getters’ margins in the vote reported so far, and estimates for which vote-getter leads in the remaining votes that we expect from each county.
| County | Yes | No | Percent of votes in | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin | 73% | 27% | >95% | |||
| Cuyahoga | 74 | 26 | >95% | |||
| Hamilton | 65 | 35 | >95% | |||
| Summit | 65 | 35 | >95% | |||
| Montgomery | 59 | 41 | >95% | |||
| Stark | 53 | 47 | >95% | |||
| Lucas | 64 | 36 | >95% | |||
| Butler | 51 | 49 | >95% | |||
| Lorain | 62 | 38 | >95% | |||
| Delaware | 59 | 41 | >95% | |||
| Warren | 47 | 53 | >95% | |||
| Lake | 60 | 40 | >95% | |||
| Mahoning | 56 | 44 | >95% | |||
| Clermont | 48 | 52 | >95% | |||
| Medina | 55 | 45 | >95% | |||
| Trumbull | 57 | 43 | >95% | |||
| Licking | 51 | 49 | >95% | |||
| Greene | 49 | 51 | >95% | |||
| Portage | 61 | 39 | >95% | |||
| Fairfield | 51 | 49 | >95% | |||
| Wood | 55 | 45 | >95% | |||
| Clark | 50 | 50 | >95% | |||
| Geauga | 55 | 45 | >95% | |||
| Miami | 40 | 60 | >95% | |||
| Richland | 42 | 58 | >95% | |||
| Wayne | 42 | 58 | >95% | |||
| Columbiana | 44 | 56 | >95% | |||
| Allen | 35 | 65 | >95% | |||
| Ashtabula | 54 | 46 | >95% | |||
| Tuscarawas | 46 | 54 | >95% | |||
| Erie | 57 | 43 | >95% | |||
| Hancock | 40 | 60 | >95% | |||
| Union | 51 | 49 | >95% | |||
| Muskingum | 46 | 54 | >95% | |||
| Knox | 42 | 58 | >95% | |||
| Ross | 48 | 52 | >95% | |||
| Sandusky | 45 | 55 | >95% | |||
| Jefferson | 41 | 59 | >95% | |||
| Washington | 41 | 59 | >95% | |||
| Belmont | 40 | 60 | >95% | |||
| Pickaway | 45 | 55 | >95% | |||
| Marion | 49 | 51 | >95% | |||
| Darke | 27 | 73 | >95% | |||
| Ashland | 42 | 58 | >95% | |||
| Huron | 44 | 56 | >95% | |||
| Seneca | 40 | 60 | >95% | |||
| Scioto | 37 | 63 | >95% | |||
| Athens | 72 | 28 | >95% | |||
| Mercer | 21 | 79 | >95% | |||
| Auglaize | 27 | 73 | >95% | |||
| Shelby | 24 | 76 | >95% | |||
| Ottawa | 53 | 47 | >95% | |||
| Lawrence | 34 | 66 | >95% | |||
| Logan | 37 | 63 | >95% | |||
| Fulton | 39 | 61 | >95% | |||
| Putnam | 17 | 83 | >95% | |||
| Preble | 37 | 63 | >95% | |||
| Madison | 47 | 53 | >95% | |||
| Brown | 36 | 64 | >95% | |||
| Clinton | 40 | 60 | >95% | |||
| Morrow | 40 | 60 | >95% | |||
| Crawford | 40 | 60 | >95% | |||
| Champaign | 42 | 58 | >95% | |||
| Defiance | 39 | 61 | >95% | |||
| Williams | 37 | 63 | >95% | |||
| Highland | 34 | 66 | >95% | |||
| Perry | 42 | 58 | >95% | |||
| Guernsey | 47 | 53 | >95% | |||
| Coshocton | 47 | 53 | >95% | |||
| Henry | 35 | 65 | >95% | |||
| Van Wert | 29 | 71 | >95% | |||
| Carroll | 39 | 61 | >95% | |||
| Hocking | 48 | 52 | >95% | |||
| Holmes | 25 | 75 | >95% | |||
| Jackson | 37 | 63 | >95% | |||
| Hardin | 41 | 59 | >95% | |||
| Fayette | 40 | 60 | >95% | |||
| Wyandot | 39 | 61 | >95% | |||
| Adams | 32 | 68 | >95% | |||
| Gallia | 32 | 68 | >95% | |||
| Pike | 39 | 61 | >95% | |||
| Meigs | 36 | 64 | >95% | |||
| Paulding | 29 | 71 | >95% | |||
| Harrison | 38 | 62 | >95% | |||
| Morgan | 42 | 58 | >95% | |||
| Monroe | 33 | 67 | >95% | |||
| Noble | 36 | 64 | >95% | |||
| Vinton | 37 | 63 | >95% | |||
We stopped updating our forecasts at 1 a.m. Eastern on Nov. 8. These graphics and estimates are now showing archived data as of that time.
Live forecast: Estimating the outcome
This is our current best estimate for the outcome of this race. We look at the votes that have been reported so far and adjust our estimate based on what we expect from the votes that remain.
How our estimated margin has changed so far
The lines below show how the reported margin (dashed line) compares with our estimated final margin (solid line surrounded by an estimate of uncertainty). As a rule, when our estimated margin is steady in the presence of new vote data, our forecast is more trustworthy.