Supreme Court Strikes Down Student Debt Cancellation, Cites Nancy Pelosi

The Supreme Court struck down Biden’s student debt forgiveness program. Curiously, Nancy Pelosi called this correctly.

Student Debt Cancellation Image from Tweet by President Biden

Today the US Supreme Court wisely struck down President Biden’s executive power garb that usurps powers granted by the Constitution to the legislative branch of government. The 77-Page Supreme Court Decision was 6-3.

A paragraph on page 23 (PDF page 28) caught my eye.

… (quoting Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U. S. 243, 267–268 (2006)). As then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi explained: “People think that the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness. He does not. He can postpone. He can delay. But he does not have that power. That has to be an act of Congress.” Press Conference, Office of the Speaker of the House (July 28, 2021).

If you thought Nancy Pelosi never made any sense, you stand corrected.

The Unthinkable President Biden

Hoot of the Day

Despite being warned in advance, by Nancy Pelosi, President Biden called the decision “unthinkable”.
Precisely because he could not think, Biden kept upping the ante with more and more delays culminating in debt forgiveness for at least 16 million borrowers.

Biden doesn’t think. Instead he lets Elizabeth Warren do his thinking for him. Warren’s handwriting is all over the unthinking president’s handling of student debt. And her signature is all over Biden’s Marxist nominees to the Fed.

Elizabeth Warren May as Well Be President, She Makes All Biden’s Calls

On December 28, 2021 I made the case Elizabeth Warren May as Well Be President, She Makes All Biden’s Calls

Joe Biden’s nominee for the Comptroller of the Currency Saule Omarova on oil, coal and gas industries: “We want them to go bankrupt if we want to tackle climate change.”

No one should be surprised by this even though Biden is not bright enough to find these Marxist nut cases on his own.

See the above link for details on who is making Biden’s calls.

And check out this Tweet by Saule Omarova praising Russia.

Say what you will about old USSR, there was no gender pay gap there.

Mercy!

Enough is Enough

The Supreme Court finally had enough of Biden’s nonsense.

Perhaps you think student debt should be cancelled. I strongly disagree. But that is not the point. The point is, as Nancy Pelosi understood: “People think that the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness. But he does not have that power.

You may believe in student debt cancellation, but you should not believe nor want presidents taking matters into their own hands with powers they do not have. Both Trump and Biden have taken such actions, but Biden far more often than Trump.

This effort by Biden, to the tune of $400 billion, was clearly unconstitutional.

Since when do presidents get to spend $400 billion without any such law being passed by Congress? Try never, as it should be.

Nonetheless, President Biden says “This fight isn’t over.”

This fight Is Over

Barring an actual bill that passes Congress, the fight is over. But the House will not pass such a bill. And the bill would not sail through the Senate even if the House did.

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

56 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
alx west
10 months ago

“Say what you will about old USSR, there was no gender pay gap there.“
Mercy!
——–
what was mercy about? techinically she was correct. !!

USSR did not have private market based economy. there are no any private industries at all.

all was run by goverment, so salaries were equal for man and women!
amount of those was set up on federal-local levels.

alx

Jack groshans
Jack groshans
10 months ago
Reply to  alx west

That is actually not true. Russia does use a form of our economic system. Their tax system is a rough go. The poor are much poorer. The rich are pretty much left alone. Most of their GDP 8s geared toward the government spending and military.

LM2020
LM2020
10 months ago

This may have been a vote buying scheme according to some of the other commenters on here, but the people who got approved for loan forgiveness and have now had it taken away – who do you think they’re going to blame?

2024 is going to be a wipeout election for the republicans – they are detested by voters under the age of 40.

Bernanke_Airdrop
Bernanke_Airdrop
10 months ago
Reply to  LM2020

Those losers were going to vote for Democrats anyways. Who cares about $10k anyways? Inflation will make that debt nothing, I was a fool for paying for school and not racking up debt.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago

I’m sorry you missed out.
But that’s what happens when you read out of date economic history.

Avery2
Avery2
10 months ago

Skip the classes and apply for $250,000 / year Dean Of Diversity & Climate Change job.

strataland
strataland
10 months ago

Reparations next.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  strataland

Reparations, pshaw.
I’m waiting for the reprisals to the reparations.

shamrockva
shamrockva
10 months ago

“Since when do presidents get to spend $400 billion without any such law being passed by Congress?”

There was a law passed, the HEROES act, and the plain text clearly gives the Secretary of Education the authority to modify student loans in a period of emergency. Biden exposed the stupidity of that law, surprise surprise. The supreme court had to insert a interpretation of that law that is not there in order to cancel the student loan modification order by the secretary of education. The country is better off for it but this is nothing but another 6-3 politically based ruling.

RonJ
RonJ
10 months ago
Reply to  shamrockva

That congress passed a law, doesn’t make it constitutional.

shamrockva
shamrockva
10 months ago
Reply to  RonJ

That’s true, I haven’t read the text of the decision, did they just throw out the whole law?

BENW
BENW
10 months ago
Reply to  shamrockva

Modifying vs cancelling loans are two different things.

Next up, according to AOC, is an attempt to forgive the student loan debt using the 1965 Education Act.

Good luck with that!

Micheal Engel
10 months ago

In the Gilded Age (1865 – 1896) the supreme court ruled the country, not the
president, neither congress or the labor unions.
In 2008 Obama sent kids to the classrooms. It was cheaper than burning and rioting in the streets. In 2020 Obama unleashed them against Trump.
Teaser student loans at variable market prices, with an option to skip on payment for 1Y, but not interest rates. Biden tax millennial and Gen Z to reduce the gov budget deficit.

VokEtsVok
VokEtsVok
10 months ago

Thanks to SCOTUS for putting stop to another vote buying scheme by democrats.

Doug78
Doug78
10 months ago

I am waiting for Mish to comment on France because everyone else it seems.

Bam_Man
Bam_Man
10 months ago

Isn’t there still a moratorium on student loan payments anyway?
They won’t have to “forgive” the loans.
Just keep extending the payment moratorium and you get the same result.

Dave
Dave
10 months ago

The good parent will give you ice cream for dinner. The mean and evil (and racist) parent will take it away.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  Dave

Vote for me and I’ll give you $10,000 to $20,000.

Six000MileYear
Six000MileYear
10 months ago

Another outcome from this decision will be a stream of income for the government from student loan payments. This will help delay the next debt limit battle.

Sebastian
Sebastian
10 months ago

Had a chuckle at the reference to the USSR. Brings to mind the old Soviet saying – “we pretend to work, and they pretend to pay us”

Doug78
Doug78
10 months ago
Reply to  Sebastian

The Soviet Union fell but Marxists are still alive and kicking like our imported Omarova. The never-ending war between the moderates and the extremes has turned from cold to hot and now to burning.

Steve Hummel
Steve Hummel
10 months ago

All the more reason to broadcast the new monetary paradigm of Gifting to the masses in order to insure the victory of politicians who want to avoid economic collapse via its virtually universal benefits. Even libertarians will not be able to personally resist its benefits and, if they’re philosophically honest, they’ll have to agree that a monopoly paradigm that private banks enjoy…cannot be defended.

Bam_Man
Bam_Man
10 months ago

Right from the get-go this was nothing but a case of “throw the bowl of spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks”.

Zardoz
Zardoz
10 months ago
Reply to  Bam_Man

That’s modern leadership

Nonplused
Nonplused
10 months ago

The Bee had this correct: link to babylonbee.com

Doug78
Doug78
10 months ago
Reply to  Nonplused

Yes. The Bee is often right and always funnt.

Zardoz
Zardoz
10 months ago

It was obvious from the start that the executive branch doesn’t have this power, and I’m fairly certain Biden knew it. Looks like a play to say ‘see what happens when you don’t vote? Evil justices get appointed for life, and now you’ll be paying on those loans for life”

Pretty solid strategy.

Cocoa
Cocoa
10 months ago
Reply to  Zardoz

He is just pandering to the stupid youth vote which desperately needs to take a civics 101 class. Dept. Of Ed does a lot of dumb stuff like charge absurd % interest when they have access to cheap money and then let the predatory banks manage it. This imperial executive department attitude needs to be cut off at the knees and thank God the courts can do this. Still, he can pander to millennials that don’t know what country they live in and get those cheap and easy votes. It was probably always planned this way. Like reparations to get Black vote.

Zardoz
Zardoz
10 months ago
Reply to  Cocoa

The stupid youth are shiftable… the stupid olds belong to trump.

Jack groshans
Jack groshans
10 months ago
Reply to  Zardoz

Let’s hear it for all us olds… all Trump policies WERE and ARE … SMACK ON.

MPO45v2
MPO45v2
10 months ago
Reply to  Zardoz

Exactly correct. The voting scales are tipping in favor of millenials and zoomers, they are actually a larger population block than boomers and it will only grow over time as more and more boomers die off at a rate of 5000 per day most of whom vote republican. I suspect 2024 elections will be the last time republicans hold offices at the federal level but we’ll see.

The supreme court also recently slapped down the GOP’s gerrymandering nonsense but there wasn’t a post about it here.

link to politico.com

All that needs to happen is millenials and zoomers need to get off their butt and vote. And of course register all those incoming ‘open borders’ refugees as democrats and the GOPs failure will be complete and total. Got popcorn to watch it all from afar?

RJD1955
RJD1955
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

The younger voting block can and will most likely change as they age.
Although the following quote is attributable to Winston Churchill, there is no record that he actually said it (most likely a variation of what a French politician quipped in the 1800s)

If You Are Not a Liberal at 25, You Have No Heart. If You Are Not a Conservative at 35 You Have No Brain.

Zardoz
Zardoz
10 months ago
Reply to  RJD1955

The hippies changed because they got comfortable middle class lives. That’s not going to happen for zoomers

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  RJD1955

What is a Republican – a Democrat that grew up.

MPO45v2
MPO45v2
10 months ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker

These days it’s more like someone that has less than 10 years of life left on this earth. See ya boomers!

PB
PB
10 months ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker

i think the joke was….a democrat who got mugged

Stuki Moi
Stuki Moi
10 months ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker

“What is a Republican – a Democrat that grew up.”

..grew older. Not “up.”

Still the same blind faith in all and any illiterate, self promoting wannabe stongmen as always. Just now also demanding that Massa throw them a few percent of the loot they steal from those more productive; instead of using absolutely 100% of it on the childish grandstanding they cheered for back when they were still young enough to get laid without having to pay for it.

Jack groshans
Jack groshans
10 months ago
Reply to  Stuki Moi

I did my college the easy way. I went in the Navy. Vietnam veteran . Retired Navy.
I didn’t ask for a dime, I didn’t borrow money. I didn’t demand anything from anybody. Nobody owes me anything.

E
E
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

Correct. They will do so, never having learned the lessons of past generations. They will demand services from the government. When there are unignorable deficits, they will demand that higher incomes be taxed more. Unsustainable deficits will require “stimulus” and inflation. Then as the world’s most productive and creative people and companies choose to leave / not emigrate to the US, the millenials will wonder why their lifestyles lag and they will demand more government services to allow them to live a higher lifestyle than they produce. Which will require more services, income transfers and…higher taxes. Meanwhile, other countries more hospitable to capital will grow faster, have lower unemployment, and will slowly gain, then surpass the US. Democracy contains the fruits of its own demise… that voters will vote for politicians who offer them “stuff” paid for by others. I hope I’m wrong.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  E

Democracy works until you run out of other people’s money.
(It used to be Socialism, but you can’t tell the difference anymore.)

Siliconguy
Siliconguy
10 months ago
Reply to  E

See also, Argentina.

Hey, comments now work in Firefox on Linux!

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  Siliconguy

And in the library with a candlestick.

Jim Lisi
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

I think refugees lean conservative on social issues. Illegal immigration will become an interesting play of socialism v. family values when the second generation is born here and reaches voting age.

PB
PB
10 months ago
Reply to  Jim Lisi

I agree. maybe i’m 40 years off, my the wonderful lady who cuts my hair, from Vietnam, said to me: you can’t even say what you think in this country now

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  PB

Unwoke people shouldn’t think wrong and unDemocratic things out loud.

VokEtsVok
VokEtsVok
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

Well, democratic party so drastically morphed into socialist democratic party, going forward only freeloaders, uninformed/misguided, perverts and federal workers will vote for democrats.

Stuki Moi
Stuki Moi
10 months ago
Reply to  VokEtsVok

“…only freeloaders, uninformed/misguided, perverts and federal workers will vote for democrats.”

And only freeloaders, uninformed/misguided, perverts and deadweights on welfare will vote for Republicans.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  Stuki Moi

Deadweights on welfare voting Republican?
Trevon, are you sure?

RonJ
RonJ
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

” Got popcorn to watch it all from afar?”

Empires fail from the outside, in.

See ya Karen!
See ya Karen!
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

The change from Disqus has really resulted in a decline in the quality of the comments here.

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

If what you say is true, the country won’t last long under single party rule. No country ever has. Unchecked power ALWAYS leads to the same ending.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  TexasTim65

So?
China, 74 years and counting.
To quote JMK: “In the long run we are all dead.”

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
10 months ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker

Yes, but China doesn’t have several hundred million armed citizens.

But rather than individuals, it would most likely be a second coming of the south ceding. This time it would probably be into 3 parts: The 2 coastal regions and the middle and southern states that formed 3 new countries.

Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
10 months ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker

TexasTim, as cold as it is I will not surrender the Northern Midwest to Canada.

Bernanke_Airdrop
Bernanke_Airdrop
10 months ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

Yes, but these are arguments in favor of dissolving the Union, since what you have are fundamentally different peoples with entirely different outlooks. Otherwise, you’ll end up with an intolerable one party state without anything to stop a Leftist purity spiral. The ‘Democracy’ will end up becoming performative, and there will no feedback outside of elite consensus within the inner party.

Jeffrey Kassel
Jeffrey Kassel
10 months ago
Reply to  Zardoz

Yep

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.